« September 2006 | Main | November 2006 »

October 26, 2006

Toxic mattresses...

My post about SIDS, which I posted on Mothering.com's boards, generated lots of discussion... mostly grateful to know this is BS science that is trying to scare parents, for which I'm glad. But I was a little surprised at how many wrote, "But I will still buy an organic mattress, because of the toxic fumes!"

The theory behind this is that mattresses which have been treated to be inflammable must give off fumes which are toxic for humans to breathe.

Personally, this doesn't make a lot of sense to me. I have a hard time believing that just about every industrialized country treats mattresses to make them less flammable, and adults sleep on them 8 hours a night every night for years and years, without a marked affect from the treatment. I think we'd definitely see some changes in rates of allergy/asthma problems from the times when mattresses began to be regularly treated. Maybe even other symptoms... headaches, for one, all kinds of sleep disorders, I can think of a million things that breathing toxic fumes would cause.

Regardless, *everyone* knows this is true. Googling "toxic mattress fumes," will pull up thousands of results confirming that mattresses are toxic. Of course, almost unanimously these are sites which are selling organic mattresses. Some are selling other things. Some just say it to say it. NONE have any proof whatsoever, that I've been able to find, that mattresses emit toxic fumes.

I'm not saying proof is not out there. I'm simply saying that it seems it would be easier to find. If this were really such a big problem, I cannot imagine that the CDC and similar organizations for other countries around the world, would not have researched it and made public their findings.

I did find this, from the National SIDS Council of Australia...
http://www.sidsandkids.org/documents/September2005_000.doc

Also check out their FAQ on safe sleeping. This is a PDF file.
http://svc021.wic005tp.server-web.com/documents/FAQOctober2006.pdf
They restate their position that the claim about gases from mattresses contributing to SIDS is patently false.

Here's a news article about mattress toxicity; please note that the person suggesting that mattresses are toxic is SELLING MATTRESSES!

Here's a press release about flammability regulations for mattresses with some very dramatic photos.
http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/prerel/prhtml06/06091.html

There are so many things in this universe to be legitmately worried about, I hate to think of so many people jumping at the shadow that is mattress fumes. On the other hand, if anyone has PROOF... real live scientific studies (which, IMO, it would be very very easy to conduct!) which prove that mattresses are toxic, please do let me know!

October 22, 2006

SIDS and Mattress-wrapping...

There have been post after post on Mothering and other mama message boards about the dangers of placing baby on an unwrapped mattress. This issue has been confusing the heck out of me, soooo...

Ok, so I bit my fear bullet and went on a search to find out what the deal was with the New Zealand studies about SIDS. Turns out that NZ previously had pretty high rates of SIDS and thus they initiated a big campaign to go after it.

Unfortunately the only sources I can find which cite mattress wrapping as a factor in reducing SIDS deaths are secondhand. The site usually referred to in disucssions about mattress-wrapping is cotdeath2000.co.nz. (Sorry, I'm deliberately not linking to it directly.) Cotdeath2000 is not affiliated with a medical organization. It's "someones" website. I tried to track it down, but the New Zealand domain registry service doesn't provide much in the way of information. I'd be interested to know what other domains these people own, but I do know they own both cotlife2000.co.nz and cotlife2000.com.

First thing I found, dated 2006, is an article about a scientist castigating Auckland University for releasing this study about cot death for publication; claims are made that the study is both biased and invalid.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE0610/S00025.htm

The end of the article states:

The nationwide cot death rate has fallen by 70% since mattress-wrapping began and the Pakeha rate has fallen by around 85%. These reductions in cot death rates cannot be attributed to orthodox cot death prevention advice (e.g. face-up sleeping). There has been no material change to that advice in New Zealand since 1992.

But I went to the New Zealand Ministry of Health website (http://www.moh.govt.nz) and looked up SIDS and cot death, and was unable to find even a single mention there of mattress-wrapping. You'd think if it really made such a significant change, the MOH would discuss it on their site! So basically they make this claim about a reduction in the rate of SIDS with nothing to back it up, which seems very odd to me.

Here's some info from New Zealand's Ministry of Health for 2002 (the most recent year I could find).
http://www.nzhis.govt.nz/stats/fetal/sids.html
http://www.nzhis.govt.nz/stats/fetal/keyfacts.html

If you go to New Zealand's "HealthEd" database and search for SIDS, there are a series of articles discussing smoking, "back to sleep," safe bedsharing, and more on smoking. Nothing on mattress-wrapping. (Unfortunately these are not linkable).
http://www.healthed.govt.nz

Here's an article from NZ about (sad, sad) a SIDS case where the factor of smoking and bed sharing comes into play.
http://www.gisborneherald.co.nz/arti...iid=547&sud=27
(FWIW, NZ is not against bed sharing. But apparently smoking AND sharing a bed dramatically increases risks. Makes sense to me!)

Here's an article from Mothering magazine from 2002 in which no mention is made of mattress-wrapping...
http://www.mothering.com/articles/new_baby/sleep/taylor.html

Canada is not recommending mattress-wrapping...
http://www.dundasstarnews.com/dsn/news/news_629359.html

Nothing on the CDC website about it...
http://www.cdc.gov/SIDS/riskfactors.htm

Basically the only thing I have been able to find citing mattress wrapping are articles which refer back to the study listed at cotlife2000.co.nz. This link, which another poster posted (http://www.healthychild.com/cribdeathcause.htm) cites the man from the cotlife website (Sprott) as its source. So there are tons of websites talking about what they say on the cotlife website, but nothing else I can find. Not a single other source that I can find with any research or statistics to back it up. Plenty of sites selling mattress wrapping materials cite these statistics, though!

This article also says:

In spite of denial and opposition from orthodox SIDS organizations, no research has disproved this gaseous poisoning explanation for crib death.

Ok, someone please tell me why a SIDS organization would pooh pooh a possible cause for SIDS??? What would the motivation be? I don't understand that. Secondly, this is flawed logic. Disproved??? How would you "disprove" this??? So they say 800 people used mattress wrapping and not one had a case of SIDS. Who says there would've been a case of SIDS there ANYways????

This article goes on to say...

This logical finding explains every factor already known about crib death, and is backed by scientific research (Sprott 1996, 2000) and eight years of practical proof consisting of a crib death prevention campaign that continues in New Zealand.

Again their source is the same person, same thing, over and over again. Honestly, this seems like a pretty easy thing to track if ANY SIDS organization wanted to. I can't imagine that if the evidence were really so compelling, that Canada and the US government wouldn't have gotten on the bandwagon to see what effect it has.

Finally:

A 100% successful crib death prevention campaign has been going on in New Zealand for the past eight years. Midwives and other healthcare professionals throughout New Zealand have been actively advising parents to wrap mattresses. During this time, there has not been a single SIDS death reported among the over 100,000 New Zealand babies who have slept on mattresses wrapped in a specially formulated polyethylene cover. The number of crib deaths in New Zealand that have occurred since mattress-wrapping began in 1994 is about 550. The number of crib deaths that have occurred in New Zealand on a properly wrapped mattress is zero.

Gosh that sounds wonderful doesn't it? Except NOWHERE do they back it up. If this is true, why is it not on the New Zealand Ministry of Health website? Why is it not on ANY single solitary SIDS organization website? It just doesn't make any sense. Sure they have a list of references here; but most of those they are using to discuss general issues regarding SIDS. Not once do they actually attach a statistic to a valid source aside from this Sprott guy.

I would be grateful if anyone finds anything more than I have, if they'd post it... I've looked and looked! I just would like to be able to only be scared about things that really are a threat to my baby. It doesn't seem to me that mattresses are one of those things I should be too concerned about.

SIDS is a boogeyman to parents, IMO, and scares us to death. Scares me to death! I hate to think someone is preying on our desire to protect our children at any costs. So if there IS independant research about this and I'm not finding it, that is NOT sponsored by this Sprott guy or Baby Safe products, I'd be glad to hear it. I hate thinking people have unethical motivations for things like this.

Of course, everyone needs to make their own decisions for their family and their baby. Hopefully though, we can make decisions about things that are rooted in reality and not superstition or someone's desire to sell mattress-wrapping materials and "safer" mattresses.

October 19, 2006

Sonogram pictures...

32 Week Sonogram...

I wasn't sure if I was going to do another sonogram... I don't think I really *needed* one, per se. They recommended a follow-up after my first scan, but apparently that is just routine. Nothing was abnormal or anything.

But, for me.. I was still in a state of disbelief that there really is an actual baby-sized baby in my belly. I look down at myself and I just look and feel so BIG... it's like, where's the baby? Even with all the kicking. Even with being able to look down and see my belly jiggling from her kicking and moving inside me. Even with all that, it still wasn't real to me. In my head, baby was still a teensy little four month old fetus. Not really a BABY, yet.

Well, we decided to go, and it was today, and it was amazing. Amazing. This technology is just phenomenal. That they can just touch me, and up pops my baby's face, right there, just like that. Amazing!!!!

She is fine. She is perfect. She was moving, opening her mouth, blinking her little eyes, squirming around. I could feel the movement inside of me while watching her move on the screen. She was head down, but sort of diagonal, and had her hands both up in front of her face, like a little boxer. She smiled! Honestly she is just perfect.

Tears were leaking out my eyes while I watched the screen, I just couldn't help it. The whole thing is such an incomprehensible miracle. No matter how much I may *know* about babies (having been doing sooooo much research!), or anything else... that there is a baby inside of me is still just... astonishing!

The fact that MY body, which I've always viewed with more than a little contempt, could create something so perfect... well that is even more astonishing. For the first time in my life, I feel proud of my body. Years and years of shame over my weight are completely overwhelmed by the fact that my body is making this perfect little person, and all I have to do is allow it to do its work. Millions and billions of tiny little cells knowing just where to go, just what to do, creating the placenta, feeding the baby, helping her grow, getting my breasts ready to feed her, getting my pelvis ready to birth her, all this going on at once... and going RIGHT.

All along I feel like I've just been waiting for something to go wrong. Not that I would lose my baby!!! But that I would have all kinds of problems, as most of my friends have had. That I'd wind up with exactly what I don't want, a medicalized pregnancy leading to a birth full of interventions because my body MUST be broken.

Well, it's just... NOT. Everything is working. Everything is growing exactly as it should. I feel like I've gained a little too much weight, but my body apparently knows exactly what is needed to care for this little girl in my belly. So maybe I'll be able to quiet my worries, and trust myself and my body a little bit, for the very first time in my life. Surrender to the process. Be at peace.

I can't wait to meet my little girl!

October 17, 2006

Class affair...

Charlie and I went to our first birth class last night. We don't really *need* it, to be honest. I'm doing Hypnobabies at home, and I actually really am enjoying it. Who knew it would be so much fun?

I mostly wanted to do a class because of the social aspect of it... meeting other pregnant mamas! I chose a Birthing from Within class because I loved the book, and because it seemed very likely that I'd find other semi-crunchy mamas there to talk to.

Right before we went, I started having second thoughts about the class. The book Birthing from Within is wonderful, and I enjoyed it. I loved the discussions about our expectations, fears, worries about both birthing and becoming a mother/parent. I loved the idea of sitting around with other mamas/parents doing birth art and chatting. Fun! But the book also includes pain tolerance exercises using a piece of ice. A teeeeeensy part of the book for me, but I wondered if it would be such a teensy part of the class?

Doing pain tolerance exercises would actually be totally contrary to the whole idea of Hypnobabies, which is focusing on birth as an intense series of sensations. Intense, powerful, but not *painful.*

Well, I decided to give it a try, and now I'm kind of wishing I hadn't. Expectations, expectations!

Here's what I did NOT expect.

I did not expect to be in a tiny basement with only two other couples. Which apparently fosters intimacy and that is wonderful, but it's not very many people to meet and be social with.

I did not expect both of the two other couples to be completely uninformed about birth. I mean, I expected that they had at least read... yanno, Birthing From Within! Nope. One woman had read one book (Active Birth, so a good one!), the other had not read any. At about 30 weeks pregnant.

I know that I go overboard with things like this. (Well, really, what other thing is LIKE becoming a mother for the first time?) I've wanted to have a baby my entire life. I've been totally obsessed with learning everything I can about pregnancy, birth, babies, motherhood. I am well aware that there is lots I cannot know until I go through it, but darnit... I plan to be prepared! :) I am always a prolific reader, and I've read... maybe 20 books. Plus I'm addicted to the Mothering message boards, where I read all different kinds of debates that make me go seek more information on the internet on my own. Plus tons and tons of birth stories! Oh how I love the birth stories! :)

But it honestly scared me to see a mama telling the class that she trusts her doctor, feels safest in the hospital, and hasn't read much about birth because there's so much conflicting information out there. It scared me to hear her say that her doctor told her at her 26 week appointment that she was having a HUGE baby and would need a c-section (based on a notoriously inaccurate sonogram!). It scared me to hear her say that she feels empowered going into the hospital when the reality is that she obviously had NO CLUE about the basic pitfalls of having a baby in a hospital.

Don't get me wrong; I believe a mama should be able to birth wherever she chooses. Whether she is informed or not. The choice is ALWAYS with the mama. But I wanted to sit down and rattle off some statistics for her, I did, I wanted to! I didn't!!!! But I SO wanted to.

The other woman was not so scary; she was only six months along, was reading Active Birth, and was birthing at a birthing center with midwives. It was just this one woman, C, who made my stress levels go shooting through the roof. I have this awful tendency to want to rescue everyone, and I wanted to rescue her!

So, anyways, then began the pain tolerance stuff. The teacher started out by asking us, on a scale of 1 to 100, how painful we expected childbirth to be. Well, yanno, I'm doing the Hypnobabies thing. I believe I deserve an easy, safe, comfortable birth! I believe that I can have that. But I knew that if I said I believed birth to be TOO easy, she'd correct me. I just knew it. My husband and I both put our expectations of birth at around 50, and yes, she corrected us, and told us that she didn't want us to be expecting an easy birth and get a really hard one. I responded that for me, I felt that believing I'd have a really hard, painful birth, would be setting myself up for a hard, painful birth. She disagreed. *sigh* I don't necessarily think that is true for everyone, btw... but it IS true for me.

So then she passed out the ice, and we went through a series of exercises holding the ice. Now here is one thing that really upset me. C, the woman headed straight for a c-section happy doctor attended birth, was not really feeling any pain or discomfort from the ice. All the rest of us were! (Try holding a piece of ice in your hand for 60 seconds. To me, very uncomfy!) Anyways, C tried a few different things. She moved the ice to the inside of her wrist. She tried it on her neck. She just wasn't really perceiving it as painful at all. The teacher, however, seemed determined that she WOULD feel pain, she'd find a way!

I mean, isn't it possible that this woman has a high tolerance for pain, and is going to have a super easy labor? Isn't it possible that giving her confidence about her bodies ability to cope, vs. making her feel "broken" for not experiencing it the same way everyone else did, might have done more for her birth?

I know I'm overreacting, but this seriously upset me. The whole thing upset me. It got me all discombobulated and I wound up having insomnia all night till 4am, which I haven't had in a while. (Baby makes me sleepy!) So I'm going to try to get out of the class. The other aspect, btw, is that I already know all the information the teacher is giving us. I know the stages of labor, I know how the uterus works, I have seen tons of pictures of it, I can't wait to see my placenta! I know that if I start freaking out and saying I cannot do it, that means I'm in transition and ALMOST DONE! I know that I'm a little bit bossy sometimes (ok, maybe more than a little), and I have a hard time finding a balance between chatting and being... pushy. It's the Leo in me. It comes from a good place (wanting to help), but almost always engenders a bad reaction. I'm working on finding better ways to do it, or just hushing up, but I am not there yet... and I know I won't be able to help myself in this class! And, as you can see, the result is totally stressing me out.

I wonder if she'll refund at least half of our money!